Built for the obligations, not around them.
Workplace AI carries obligations around transparency, human oversight and record-keeping. GuardianEye is designed with those in view; classification depends on the specific use case, and the organisation deploying it remains responsible for its assessment.
The approach
The EU AI Act uses a risk-based approach. CloudSeals designs the product behind GuardianEye around narrow safety rules, privacy controls, human review and evidence. Customers remain responsible for assessing their deployment against applicable legal, privacy and worker-representation requirements. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
What the design gives you
- Transparency: the configured rules are written down; workers and their representatives can be told exactly what the cameras are asked to watch for.
- Human oversight: every ticket is reviewed and closed by a named person; the product does not act on its own.
- Record-keeping: detection, review and closure are retained together, with the reviewer.
- Literacy: CloudSeals publishes guidance on Article 4 AI literacy and on operationalising oversight through TrustOps.
What it deliberately does not do
It does not infer emotions or intent. It does not identify individuals as a function of detection. It does not make employment decisions. Where a rule concerns a person’s condition — drowsiness at the wheel — it is a safety-critical condition reviewed by a person, and enabling it is a decision the organisation makes with its workforce.
Start with one site.
A site assessment looks at the cameras you have, the rules that matter on your floor and how the evidence would reach your auditor. Twenty minutes to find out whether it fits.